Simpson Industrial Series IS61029 49-State 4400 PSI at 4.0 GPM CRX® 420 with AAA® Triplex Plunger Pump Cold Water Gas Professional Pressure Washer

Simpson Industrial Series IS61029 49-State 4400 PSI at 4.0 GPM CRX® 420 with AAA® Triplex Plunger Pump Cold Water Gas Professional Pressure Washer

Marsoni

M251S

$574.50

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Simpson Industrial Series IS61029 49-State 4400 PSI at 4.0 GPM CRX® 420 with AAA® Triplex Plunger Pump Cold Water Gas Professional Pressure WasherThe IS61029, Industrial Series pressure washer is an excellent addition to the portfolio of pressure washer cleaning products of SIMPSON. Perfect for construction sites, rental yards, oil fields, heavy duty paint prep, and any other big job. Featuring a reliable (49 State compliant) CRX engine and an AAA pump, the IS61029 guarantees a professional cleaning experience. Features CRX 420 engine is equipped with a low oil shutdown feature Fuel tank

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Simpson Industrial Series IS61029 49-State 4400 PSI at 4.0 GPM CRX® 420 with AAA® Triplex Plunger Pump Cold Water Gas Professional Pressure Washer orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Simpson Industrial Series IS61029 49-State 4400 PSI at 4.0 GPM CRX® 420 with AAA® Triplex Plunger Pump Cold Water Gas Professional Pressure Washer ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Simpson Industrial Series IS61029 49-State 4400 PSI at 4.0 GPM CRX® 420 with AAA® Triplex Plunger Pump Cold Water Gas Professional Pressure Washer, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Simpson Industrial Series IS61029 49-State 4400 PSI at 4.0 GPM CRX® 420 with AAA® Triplex Plunger Pump Cold Water Gas Professional Pressure Washer in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

I have an old 30 lap Ironman. This one is larger than my previous one and has more features. It took me a little while to fully figure out how the new "occasion" feature works, but I can honestly say that I will probably never use that feature. This is a good watch, but the old one is easier to read at an angle. I did not measure the angle that the other segments become visible enough to interfere with viewing the time, but I do know that it is less than my old one. I have to twist my wrist a little more to view the time than I did with the old one. My old one is over 10 years old and still keeps excellent time. I replaced the strap and battery a couple times. The plastic part on top of it broke off when I dropped it at the airport about a year ago. Eventually the whole top fell off. I glued a plastic piece on to replace the "start/split" button. The wife decided that my repair was too ugly to wear in public. I still wear the old one around the house just to bother her! Hopefully this new one will last as long. I may have to get a Velcro strap for this one. The plastic one looks better, but the Velcro type is more comfortable.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on September 22, 2014

Verified Purchase

L.S.

Houston, US

★★★★★ 5

Good watch that can take a beating

Color: Black/Gray

I have owned a Timex IronMan watch for almost 2 decades now and this will only be the 4th one I’ve bought. I wear it every day, and I rarely take it off except when I shower, but that is just because I want to wash my wrist. Between my time in the military, working on cars, swimming, and wildland firefighting I have never had one break on me. I’ve never even had a battery actually die. Every time I’ve replaced a watch is because the backlight eventually got so faint I couldn’t read the time in the dark. I have had the pin that holds the clasp on come off once, but that was when I had my hand jammed down in an engine trying to remove a part and the watch got caught because I didn’t take it off first. The only thing I am not crazy about is the size of this watch. Being a creature of habit, I normally get the smaller Ironman, but I thought I’d try something different and I guess it will just take some getting used to. Overall I am very pleased with this watch.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on August 26, 2022

Verified Purchase

Peggy O.

Fort Morgan, US

★★★★★ 5

Good watch

Color: Black/Gray

I've had other Timex watches like this one and they have always been reliable and easy to use. I want a watch that has a large face and can be seen when I'm exercising or in low light. I use the timer feature often and it is great. I'm very pleased with this watch. I know it's a men's watch but I'd love to see more Timex watches for women with large faces, similar features and bolder colors.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2024

Verified Purchase

Linda

Massapequa, US

★★★★★ 5

Very nice

Color: Black/Gray

I am a female but like the big face, easy to read. Light weight, very comfortable. Timex has always put out a great product.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on September 13, 2024

Verified Purchase

J HOMER

New York, US

★★★★★ 5

A great watch

Color: Black/Gray

It's a Timex! Inexpensive, accurate and rugged. I use it as a watch. I play golf and did not want a watch with a stem on the right side. This is the third Ironman I have owned and so far all the batteries have outlasted the straps. The strap on this one appears to be a bit more rugged than the last one so hopefully it will last at least 5 years. Seven dollars per year is a pretty good deal for this accurate and rugged watch.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on September 17, 2013