


Steel Rear Sprocket - 43 Tooth X 630 Type (22-0318)
Marsoni
M251S
Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping.
Friday, May 29
Steel Rear Sprocket - 43 Tooth X 630 Type (22-0318)Steel Rear Sprocket 43 Tooth Replaces OEM # 41201 410 000 For 630 Chain Setup as came stock with the bike below. Fits: REARS on Honda CB750F (1977 78) Supersport Please Count your sprocket teeth and check your chain length before ordering to ensure this is correct for your bike Part Number: 22 0318
Quick Dispatch:
Your Steel Rear Sprocket - 43 Tooth X 630 Type (22-0318) orders ship within 1-2 business days.
Delivery Options:
- Standard: 3-7 business days
- Fast: 2-3 business days
- Express: 1-2 business days
Order Tracking:
You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Steel Rear Sprocket - 43 Tooth X 630 Type (22-0318) ships.
Need Help?
Questions about Steel Rear Sprocket - 43 Tooth X 630 Type (22-0318), sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.
Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Steel Rear Sprocket - 43 Tooth X 630 Type (22-0318) in your area.
Get Shipping Estimates
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
You may also like
4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 2040 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Excellent socks
Size: X-Large, Color: White
Awesome love them
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2026
★★★★★ 5
very comfortable
Size: Large, Color: White
very cushioning and good value. These are my favorite socks.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 13, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Finally, socks that fit and are comfortable
Size: X-Large, Color: White
I wear size 12.5 Wide shoes and have been through numerous "large" socks that shrink after the first wash and then are just too small. Local stores sell very few options in XL. Decided to give these a try and I'm glad I did. I like the height (just over the ankle joint) versus low cut or no-show, which tend to allow junk into the gaps.
I like the material. It's thinner on top nd doesn't have compression areas. It's not overly thick, so if you are looking for cushion or extra support, look elsewhere. I have the same sock in a no-show in gray, but they are size L and are just a little too small, so I knew ahead what I was in for construction-wise. Those have been plenty durable, so it checks all the boxes.
I'll be ordering some XLs in black and will keep on the lookout for gray.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 3, 2021
★★★★★ 5
Nice fit & holds shape
Size: Large, Color: White
Wear well. Hold up in use. Maintain a shape after multiple uses.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 20, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Great socks / a bit expensive
Size: Large, Color: Black
These may be the Goldilocks of the socks I've tried. They have nearly the same quality as the MUCH pricier Darn Tough Vertex Ultralight Cushion Cool Max socks (also reviewed). They have better quality, and a higher price, than a similar pair of PUMA socks (also reviewed).
Pros: Very well made, with no loose stitching, comfortable forefoot and heel cushioning, good ventilation via top mesh, good arch compression, minimal logos and mostly solid color.
Cons: Price is a bit on the high side, but better than the Darn Tough socks.
I could honestly have made a good case for any of these three (ASICS, PUMA, or Darn Tough), which explains their collective high ratings. I did the top 3 reviews first. When I get a chance, I'll go back and review the average and terrible :)
If money is no object, get the Darn Tough Vertex. If you're price sensitive, and willing to compromise a bit on quality, go with the PUMAs, which is what I did. Otherwise, these ASICS are near the same quality as the Darn Tough, but less expensive. Tough decisions :)
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 9, 2017